The Wall Street Journal this morning threw my whole
weltanschauung into question and made me curious as to whether Hell
had frozen over.
I wondered this because the mayor of the
French town of Saint-Genis-Pouilly has actually gone and forced me to respect him, while at the same time demonstrating (perhaps) the best way to deal with these
Little shepherd Boy cries of "blasphemy." He brought out the riot police, and quadrouple dog-dared them to have their riot. I did like how he described the mood as "quasi-insurrectional." I'm guessing that's putting it lightly.
Unfortunately, I'm dealing the hardcopy, I know, how antiquated, however the article is available online, but I'm not registered, and right now I'm caught up in a self-declared moratorium on registration. Still, a site search of the phrase "Blame it on Voltaire." Ought to bring it up. Also, if somebody who
is registered gets the link, I'll be sure to update with it.
The article is published in the increasing wake of the Mohammed Cartoons controversy regarding an event late last year. Last December the town of Saint-Genis-Pouilly put on a performance of Voltaire's
Fanaticism, or Mahomet (/PBUH)
the Prophet. The 265-year old play is meant to mock all religious fanatics and all religious intolerance. Though, because of its central figure, adherents of the "Religion of Peace" are up in arms. It's no wonder that Voltaire pisses Islamists off, he's the atheistic poster-boy for Secular Europe. If Islamists can silence Voltaire and his proponents, they are one step closer to Eurabia.
The fact that
Fanaticism's main theme is how religion can be used to mask and propel political ambitions couldn't have these Muslims on edge. It's that it "insults the prophet." Somehow I'm convinced that anything could be spun as insulting to the prophet. Centuries-old satire insults the prophet. Contemporary caricature insults the prophet. Not tipping the Pizza Guy insults the prophet. See,
that's multitasking, you can issue a fatwa
and ensure the goodwill (and timely delivery) of countless delivery "people," of course it's hard to deliver food in a
burqa.
The article brings up how the "King of Doublethink," coined by my campus's Islamic scholar, Tariq Ramadan, opposed the performance of
Fanaticism in 1994, for the 300th birthday of Voltaire. The current co-opponent, Mr. Hafid Ouardiri, operates under the same school of thought, he gone from chanting, "It is forbidden to forbid," to espousing the necessity of forbidding. We should be lenient on Mr. Ouardiri though, because, apparently, Voltaire is responsible for the colonization of his native Algeria and other Muslim countries, NOT the entirety of social-political thought of the 19th Century.
The entire article is pretty good, especially the segment on his life for historical context, however there were several portions where my iron-meter (eye-ron'-met-er) nearly broke. It committed ritual suicide after this:
Mr. Arkhrouf found a copy of the play on the Internet and started shaking with rage as he read the portrayal of Muhammad as a fanatic.
After weeks of journalists of screen, paper, and light using their diction for, seemingly, no other purpose then to piss me off, this was a breath of fresh air.
Still, the article does have another shining example of how Islamists maintain possibly the most distorted worldview, ever. It quotes Al-Qaeda #2 al-Zawahri stating that "in the West," "no one dares to harm Jews . . . nor even to insult homosexuals." First off, kudos to the translator for the use of 'nor.' Nobody really does anymore, and it's nice to see it being used. Second, Ayman, buddy, pal, it is true that nowadays nobody
really goes out of their way to harm Jews. Christ, it's been ages since the last good synagogue
fire. However, the reason is about 60 years ago Germany "harmed" enough Jews to meet the quota for the whole of Western Christendom. Ever. Besides, since then, Muslims have cornered the market in Jew-harming. As for insulting homosexuals, I don't believe I could even begin to count the number of gay jokes I've told, let alone heard, in my lifetime (middle school, high school, Brokeback). BUT I'M ONLY ONE MAN! However, let's get at the heart of your problem, Ayman, with how we treat homosexuals versus how you treat them. We (America, the West, Great Aunt Sue, etc.) insult homosexuals with words, you and yours, on the other hand, insult them with fist-sized stones.
See, that's the crux of the matter, the problem with Muslims is for some reason they're never taught that while "Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words (cartoons, satire, the demagogue on the corner) will never hurt me."
Cross-Posted for the betterment of all at Wizbang Bomb Squad.